Why Aid agencies must act to save millions spent on inefficient fossil fuels

Image result for fuelHumanitarian organisations could save some half a billion dollars every year by switching from diesel and oil fuels to cleaner energy sources, research has found.

According to the report, overall picture of energy use by humanitarian agencies is one “of inefficiency and wastefulness” and it makes recommendations to tackle the situation.

The research carried out by Chatham House for the Moving Energy Initiative  says that agencies operating in many emergency settings are heavily reliant on polluting, expensive supplies of diesel and oil-based fuels.

“Humanitarians are operating in tough environments where saving lives come first” says co-author Owen Grafham, “energy is not given much thought diesel is the go-to fuel because it’s what agencies are used to and it’s quick-to-deploy.”

Yet researchers say that aid organisations are often paying extremely high prices for the electricity they generate.  Fuel supplies can be vulnerable and prices held hostage to black marketeers. Lack of system management leads to poor maintenance and frequent breakdowns.

Image result for energy sources images

The report also says that refugee camps, which have an average age of 18 years and are often home to many tens of thousands of people – put a strain on local communities and resources.

It estimates that around 5 per cent of humanitarian agency expenditure is spent on such fuels – equivalent to $1.2 billion in 2017. It claims that “achievable changes in practice and technology” -such as solar power, could save the sector some half a billion US dollars in operational costs each year.

Researchers say the presence of international humanitarian agencies supporting large groups of vulnerable people escaping war, famine or disaster  has significant implications for local economies and the environment. But little attention has been paid to the ways in which power is provided to aid operations, or to its financial and environmental impact.

Image result for fossil fuels

 

Co-author Glada Lahn said, “Energy is essential to humanitarian response. Most refugee and internal displacement camps are in remote locations, so relief efforts consume large amounts of fuel on the long-distance transport of staff, equipment, and goods such as food and water. Operations tend to rely on on-site generators to power reception centres, clinics, schools, food storage and water pumping ”.

The number of those fleeing conflict is at an unprecedented high, having risen by 3 million between 2016 and 2017. The figure of 68.5million people forcibly displaced is 60 per cent higher than it was 10 years ago. With complex conflicts in Syria, Myanmar, Yemen, the Sudans and Nigeria for example, the need for humanitarian assistance shows little sign of abating.

But the report highlights examples where innovative solutions are making a difference. Jordan, where first-of-their-kind solar plants for two major Syrian refugee camps are making annual savings of $7.5 million for UNHCR, have relieved pressures on the national electricity grid and are hoped to remain a legacy asset for local communities.

Grafham said: “In almost every humanitarian situation in which a diesel generator is in operation, there is a cost case (as well as an environmental one) for the hybridization or solarization of the energy infrastructure.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *