We all know the harmful effects of cigarette smoking, lung cancer, respiratory diseases and so on, however, it has been proven that the effects of smoking may defer depending on whether smokers use filters or not.
Research has proven that those that use filtered cigarettes will experience the effects of cigarette smoking much later than those who do not. Ordinary cigarettes almost double the risk of dying from lung cancer and also raises the risk of developing any fatal disease by nearly a third.
The study has revealed that smokers of traditional cigarettes are less likely to quit than those who smoke low-tar and menthol-flavoured alternatives.
There is no difference in lung cancer incidence, lung cancer or all-cause mortality between regular cigarette smokers and light or ultralight smokers.
However, while smokers of light/ultralight cigarettes had lower dependence, they were less likely to quit smoking. There was no difference in any of the outcomes when comparing smokers of mentholated versus unflavored cigarettes.”
But Dr Thomas has now presented the findings to an American Thoracic Society meeting in Dallas to aid healthcare for those with complications deemed to be a direct result of smoking.
“Furthermore, smokers of lights or ultralights are less likely to quit,” the author added.
“Mentholated cigarettes are associated with the same health risks as unflavoured cigarettes.
“Since the 1950s, there have been several alterations to cigarettes, including the addition of filters and menthol and lowering tar levels, in response to public concern about health risks.
“Despite these changes, smoking remains associated with 90% of lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer-related mortality.”
