Axel Witsel joined Borussia Dortmund from the Chinese Super League and the Tianjin media has torned into the Belgian international’s “self-interest” and has been exposed by the fierceness of another foreign aid Pato. In such a “triangle love”, Witsel’s actions can’t be excused but his criticism should be based on that and not on the process of signing him.
The biggest problem with Wittsel in this “triangle love” is that it is too thin and not honest enough. According to the Tianjin media, before the World Cup, Tianjin Quanjian had already proposed the idea of a salary increase renewal, and the Belgian international also responded positively. After the World Cup, Witsel joined Dortmund with one heart and didn’t even return to Tianjin. Not even the chance to bid farewell to the fans.
If the criticism against Witsel stays in these two aspects, there is no problem. However, some Tianjin media have called Vitesse’s practice “extreme self-interest”, which is obviously a criticism of the upper line, and some are too big.
In the modern commercial society, it is not a shame to legally and reasonably defend personal rights based on contracts signed by both parties voluntarily, and it cannot be called “extreme egoism” because someone defends their legitimate interests under the terms of the contract. Although Witsel was not honest enough to be willing to renew his contract, his actions did not break the bottom line. He did not refuse to return to the team (Sosa promised him to return to the team on August 5), nor did he take extreme measures to force Tianjin Quan Jian to release.
Eventually he left because the new owner Dortmund was willing to pay him a penalty of 20 million euros. In fact, only Vitesse himself knows his own different ideas at each time.
As long as he does not admit it, the outside rhetoric is unreasonable. Who knows how much Dortmund gave Wittsel before the World Cup? Who knows the process of bargaining between the two sides? Who can ensure that Vitesse is not really more inclined to renew the team before the start of the World Cup?
In fact, Dortmund has been working on signing Vitesse for several months, and it is impossible for Tianjin Quanjian to know nothing about it. It is also based on this that Quan Jian will take the initiative to ask Vitesse’s possibility of renewing the contract before the World Cup. Even when Vitessel tells the truth and clearly shows the idea of leaving, Tianjin Quanjian still has no way to stay in the Belgian international. Only in this case, Quan Jian can look for new foreign aid in a rainy day. Therefore, the criticism of Wittsel should only be directed at this.
As for the terms of the contractual terms of the two parties, the parties are voluntarily signing the contract and the contents of the contract are completely open. Therefore, in terms of contracts, Quan Jian cannot be said to have been “calculated”.
As for the personal relationship between Witsel and Pato, it should not be mixed into this transfer event to prove Vitesse’s “human misconduct.” Since Witsel has been isolated from Pato since the beginning of the season, why hasn’t anyone mentioned this before, but what about the old things after Waiters left the team? When a person does something wrong, he will smash all the mistakes he has made in the past to prove that his character has a problem.
This is a typical post-autumn account, which has no benefit for solving the problem and will only lead to an endless war of words.
More crucially, at this moment, jumping out of the past gossip and anecdote of Wittsel will only make the Tianjin media and Tianjin Quanjian fall into a logical contradiction. Since Tianjin knows that Vitesse is an isolated teammate, why should he mention the salary increase renewal before the start of the World Cup and want to retain the “little man”? Want to let this “sculp” continue to stay in the team?
The ruthlessness of Wittsel’s departure, the concealment of real thoughts before leaving, is not worth promoting and encouraging. It is also true that Tianjin Quanjian and his fans were hurt in the face of cold and cold commercial contracts. But this should not be a critical criticism of Wittsel. After breaking up, I only blame the other party for being very scum. Instead of using the spring and autumn brushstrokes to slanderly approve the predecessor, it is better to think about how to open the next paragraph without the beautiful marriage of the pit.